Kris Cardoza
Admin
 Admin
| Posts: 4527 |  | Karma: 5
|
9-17-09 HEARING to REDUCE required improvements to HWY 178 in the Nickel Project - 2009/08/20 10:30
Hey everyone...
I wanted to bring this to your attention. This hearing notice pertains to the development that the Nickel family (and their engineer, Roger McIntosh), is proposing at the mouth of the Canyon. If you remember, part of their "assurances" that the project would not have a significant impact was the fact that they would be improving 178 to major arterial standards as defined in the Metropolitan General Plan. This hearing notice is a proposal to reduce the designation of the highway from a major arterial to a collector, (or secondary highway) standards.
The difference between the two is significant...Arterials are basically highways (think Rosedale Highway, Stockdale, Mt. Vernon, Fairfax etc.) while collectors are narrower rights-of-way (think Meecham Road, Hageman Rd.). Arterials have the ability and ultimate right-of-way to allow six lanes in the future, where collectors only have the ultimate right-of-way to allow a maximum of four lanes.
If you review the minutes of the KRVR Community Meeting (November 5, 2008) you will see that they specifically referred to the "6 lanes" that would ultimately be constructed on 178. Please review this hearing notice and let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Kris Cardoza kcardoza@mchsi.com
Kris is a retired Kern County Planner and serves as KRVR's Secretary.
Administrator, KRVR.org eworinkrv@mchsi.com |